🚀 Webflow vs. Framer CMS
Justin Sinke
・
Jun 24, 2025
CMS
8 min read
Are you building a blog, launching SEO landing pages, or powering up an entire product library using a content management system? If you’re a web developer or digital marketer navigating the no-code landscape, you’ve likely asked: “Webflow or Framer — which CMS should I go with?” And while most comparison articles rightly obsess over the design editors of Webflow and Framer, there’s one topic that’s often overlooked and arguably even more critical to scalability and content strategy: the CMS. In this deep-dive, we’re unpacking every major detail of the Webflow CMS vs. Framer CMS debate. More than just a side-by-side feature battle, this article serves as both an analytical comparison and a practical guide to choosing the best no-code CMS for your needs. We’ll rate the platforms across five critical dimensions: CMS limits, integrations, the user interface (UI), field types, and the all-important rich text editor. Whether you’re building the next big no-code MVP or running a content-driven site for growth marketing, this is your definitive CMS breakdown.
👨💻 Why the CMS Matters in the No-Code Era
Before we dive in, let’s zoom out for a moment.
A CMS (content management system) is the backbone of any content-rich site. From blogs and SEO landing pages to product changelogs and team directories, your CMS determines how scalable, flexible, and integrated your site can be.
In the traditional development world, WordPress or even headless CMSs like Sanity or Contentful solve this need. But in the no-code website building space, Webflow, Framer, and Shopify are leveling up — offering powerful content management features without the complexity of servers, databases, or custom development.
Now let’s evaluate Webflow vs. Framer CMS across the five key pillars.
🧱 1. CMS Limits: Collections & Item Counts
When it comes to performance and scalability, the first question is simple: How much content can each CMS handle?
- Webflow CMS Limits:
- Free Plan: 20 CMS Collections, 50 CMS items
- CMS Plan: 40 CMS Collections, 2,000 items
- Business Plan: Up to 10,000 items
- Enterprise: Up to 20,000 items
- Framer CMS Limits:
- Free/Mini Plan: No CMS collections
- Basic Plan: 2 Collections, 1,000 pages
- Business Plan: 30,000 pages before requiring an external database
🧠 Verdict: Tie (with nuance)
Webflow offers more generous free-tier options, making it ideal for those just starting. However, Framer’s Business plan supports up to 30,000 pages, which may better suit content-heavy enterprise projects.
💡 Pro Tip: Before committing, map out your planned CMS architecture — how many collections and items you'll realistically need in the next 6–12 months. Don’t optimize for Day 1; plan for Day 100.
🔌 2. Integrations & Plugins: Extending Your CMS
In a no-code ecosystem, your CMS doesn’t live in isolation. How well it connects with tools like Notion, Airtable, or Google Sheets can define your workflow efficiency.
- Webflow Integrations:
- WhaleSync for two-way data sync with Notion, Airtable, Supabase, and Google Sheets
- Over 250 plugins in Webflow’s mature app marketplace
- Framer Integrations:
- Lightweight native integrations with Notion and Google Sheets
- Around 100 total plugins
- No WhaleSync support (yet)
🧠 Verdict: Webflow wins
Webflow’s plugin ecosystem is broader, and WhaleSync integration gives it a serious edge — enabling live two-way sync between popular no-code tools and Webflow CMS. This is a game-changer for teams building MVPs or updating large volumes of content regularly.
🎨 3. User Interface: Editing Content Day to Day
CMS power is nothing without usability — especially for marketers and content teams who aren’t technical. Here’s how UI stacks up:
- Webflow CMS UI:
- Reliable and straightforward, but a bit dated
- Collection items editable inline with supported fields like toggles and references
- Editing feels more like a database interface
- Framer CMS UI:
- Visually modern and responsive UI
- Collection editing feels smoother, with real-time previews for elements like images
- Friendly interface for less technical users
🧠 Verdict: Framer wins
If you care about day-to-day experience and ease of use, Framer feels more like Notion than a database. It’s fast, modern, and a joy to write in — which matters more than you’d think when pushing out dozens of blog posts per month.
🎛️ 4. Supported Field Types: What Kind of Data Can You Use?
Content flexibility is determined by the range of supported field types. Whether embedding videos, linking to authors, or uploading galleries, your CMS should support rich, functional schemas.
- Webflow Field Types:
- Widely supports text, rich text, link, video link, dates, switches, references, multi-images, and even code blocks
- Framer Field Types:
- Covers most basic types: text, images, dates, switches, and links
- Lacks multi-image and video link support
🧠 Verdict: Webflow wins
Even though both offer solid foundations, Webflow blows past Framer when it comes to advanced field types, and this gives developers and CMS architects more runway — especially useful when building collections like portfolios, product databases, or integration-rich landing pages.
📝 5. Rich Text Fields: For Blogs, SEO Pages, and More
Rich Text is arguably the make-or-break field for bloggers, content marketers, and SEO specialists. It allows for formatted writing — think H2s, bullet lists, embeds, CTA buttons, and videos inside your content field.
- Webflow Rich Text:
- Deep support for HTML embeds and code blocks
- Integrates with collections for dynamic content
- Functional, but editing experience isn’t as smooth as newer tools
- Framer Rich Text:
- Modern and responsive editing experience
- Smooth UX for writing and formatting
- Missing features like full code embeds
🧠 Verdict: Slight edge to Framer
Webflow wins on power (especially with embeds), but Framer’s writing experience is just better. For content creators who live inside the CMS, that matters. You can always find workarounds for embeds; it's harder to enjoy a clunky text interface.
🚀 Real-World Use Cases: When to Choose What
Webflow is best for…
- Advanced CMS use cases (e.g., multi-collection relationships, dynamic filtering)
- Marketing sites with deep SEO requirements
- No-code MVPs requiring two-way sync (e.g., via Airtable or Notion)
- Developers building custom logic or heavy integrations
Framer fits better when…
- You need a visually beautiful site quickly, with light CMS complexity
- You’re a content team that wants a modern, intuitive CMS UI
- You prioritize editability over data efficiency
- You need fewer than 5-10 collections for use
🏪 What About Shopify?
Shopify isn’t a CMS in the traditional no-code content sense, but it's essential for e-commerce. If you're looking to sell products via CMS content, Webflow integrates better with third-party tools, while Framer isn't quite there yet.
If you’re building a storefront with headless capabilities or want to embed Shopify products into rich landing pages, Webflow still has the upper hand for flexibility and plugin support.
📈 The Bottom Line: Our Verdict
Tool for tool, field for field, the Webflow CMS remains more powerful — especially for professionals who need scalability, integrations, and advanced field support.
But make no mistake: Framer isn’t far behind and is growing fast. Its modern UI and frictionless content editing make it far more approachable for early-stage teams. And as its plugin marketplace evolves, expect the CMS battle to get tighter.
For now? Use Webflow if you’re architecting a long-term CMS-driven strategy. Choose Framer if you want to move fast and publish frequently with a light-touch CMS.
🧠 Final Insight: Watch the Plugin Arms Race
In the no-code world, integrations are gold. As WhaleSync-like tools expand and Framer levels up its developer ecosystem, the battle for the best CMS experience will be won not just on features — but on collaboration, workflow, and extensibility.
Whether you're spinning up your next startup or scaling a content marketing engine, the right no-code CMS can serve as your launchpad.